Services · LLM & AI Penetration Testing

LLM
penetration testing.

Offensive testing of chatbots, copilots, RAG systems, and agentic applications — OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS-informed, aligned to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.

Standard
OWASP LLM Top 10
Adversary
MITRE ATLAS
Governance
NIST AI RMF
Retest
Included
01 / Overview

Traditional AppSec ends where LLMs begin.

LLM-powered applications invert the security model — user input steers the program, retrieved documents alter control flow, and autonomous agents take real action with real permissions. We test that surface the way adversaries already are, with payloads, chains, and agentic exploits developed by operators who live in these systems.

Coverage spans every primary LLM risk surface: prompts, retrieval, tools, fine-tuned weights, and the guardrails you built to contain them.

02 / OWASP LLM Top 10

Every category. Manually exploited.

LLM01
Prompt Injection

Direct and indirect prompt-injection across user input, retrieved documents, tool outputs, and multi-agent hand-offs.

LLM02
Sensitive Information Disclosure

Training-data leakage, system-prompt exfiltration, and PII / PHI exposure through retrieval and memory.

LLM03
Supply Chain

Model, adapter, LoRA, and dataset provenance — including poisoned fine-tuning data and malicious model artifacts.

LLM04
Data & Model Poisoning

Training-time and RAG-time poisoning of embeddings, retrieval corpora, and continuous-learning pipelines.

LLM05
Improper Output Handling

XSS, SSRF, SQLi, and RCE downstream of LLM output — including unsafe tool invocation and code-exec sinks.

LLM06
Excessive Agency

Over-scoped tools, missing human-in-the-loop, unbounded cost / action budgets, and dangerous default permissions.

LLM07
System Prompt Leakage

Extraction of guardrails, policy, and context — and the control-flow bypasses those leaks unlock.

LLM08
Vector & Embedding Weaknesses

Embedding inversion, retrieval poisoning, cross-tenant vector bleed, and metadata-filter bypass.

LLM09
Misinformation & Hallucination

Hallucinated citations, confabulated APIs, and reputational / legal exposure from over-confident output.

LLM10
Unbounded Consumption

Denial-of-wallet, token-flood, and model-availability attacks through cost and context exhaustion.

03 / Attack Surfaces

From chat to agent. Every layer.

01
Chat & Copilot

Single-turn and multi-turn chat surfaces, enterprise copilots, and IDE / productivity integrations.

02
RAG Pipelines

Retrieval-augmented systems — ingestion, chunking, embedding, vector store, and retrieval-time attacks.

03
Agentic Systems

Tool-using agents, multi-agent orchestration, and autonomous workflows operating with real permissions.

04
Fine-Tuning & Adapters

Custom model pipelines, adapters, LoRA artifacts, and training-data provenance.

05
Model Serving & APIs

Inference endpoints, batching, moderation layers, and the REST / streaming APIs wrapping the model.

06
Guardrails & Policy

Prompt-based guardrails, classifier moderation, jailbreak resistance, and red-team regression suites.

04 / Methodology

Model. Prompt. Chain. Verify.

01

Threat Modeling

Application-specific threat model aligned to OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, and NIST AI RMF — mapped to your actual architecture.

02

Adversarial Prompting

Manual jailbreak, prompt-injection, and policy-bypass testing — including multilingual, multi-modal, and indirect vectors.

03

Systemic Exploitation

Chaining LLM flaws into real impact — data exfiltration, tool abuse, SSRF, and unauthorized action through agentic loops.

04

Reporting & Retest

Reproducible payloads, fix guidance, guardrail and eval recommendations, and a verified retest after remediation.

05 / Deliverables

What ships.

  • 01
    OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage matrix
  • 02
    MITRE ATLAS-mapped adversary findings
  • 03
    Reproducible prompt-injection / jailbreak payloads
  • 04
    Agent and tool-abuse exploit chains
  • 05
    Guardrail and eval-suite recommendations
  • 06
    Verified retest after remediation
06 / Engage

Test the surface
your adversary wants most.

Pre-launch assessment, continuous red-team on release, or guardrail / eval design. Scoped under NDA.